For some reason, I cannot open or play Davis Weekly 8 on my PS3 Browser, it keeps telling me “there is not enough space” and i got 103GB left. I tried to open other Davis Weekly’s and they worked fine except this one, is it because of this s “IntenseDebate comments” under the video, Tor?
tor you really could talk some shit at times. first of all, your argument is weak, just because there isn't a formal term for a resolution(x) of 525<x<720 doesn't mean that the term sub-HD is invalid, sub means under, therefore it is a fitting term since 600p is certainly below that which is considered HD(720P). i totally agree with hiphop in saying that games rendered in 600p, 620p or 640p are not HD, they're upscaled to 720p and 1080p, like COD4, halo3, and many many more.
you could be really stubborn sometimes… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nh33bGAxl58
anyways, on a more pleasant note. good job with the davis weeklies, although i do find that they're getting shorter and shorter in duration.
if Sub-HD is below HD and you need an HDTV to view 600p content, then how is 600p not HD? 600p is NOT ED, only 480p is ED. Wouldn't 480p be sub-HD by your definition? Come on JMD you are smarter than that. Forget about the upscale. They are only upscaled to fit the tv screen because HDTV's, unlike computer monitors, can only display in 3 resolutions. So again, how is 600p not HD? Plug a computer into your tv and change the resolution to 800×600 and tell me if you can see it. Then plug it into an HDTV and tell me if you can see it. Then answer the question, how is 600p not HD? One more thing to chew on. If 600p is sub-HD because you claim it's "under" HD, then what is it compared to ED resolution, super-ED?
hey tor, i don't think you understood my post, you said: "Wouldn't 480p be sub-HD by your definition?" which is wrong, because i said "just because there isn't a formal term for a resolution(x) of 576<x<720 doesn't mean that the term sub-HD is invalid" i.e. i defined subHD to be less than 720 and more than 576. (i know i put 525 before, sue me.:) 576 is for us over here in the UK(pal), and 480p is for you yanks(NTSC)
and now you propose that "if Sub-HD is below HD and you need an HDTV to view 600p content, then how is 600p not HD?", very poor reasoning/logic. this paltry argument is stupid, subHD is an appropriate term for 600p and you have said nothing to prove otherwise.
also, i'm fully aware that if i connected my pc to my old trinitron SDTV, it wouldn't display 800×600, i wasn't disputing that.
when it comes to EDTV resolutions, 600p is just an ever so slight improvement over 576p.
600p is more than an improvement over ED which is 480p, not 576p. I'm talking NTSC resolutions. My reasoning and logic is not poor. Why can't you view a 600p resolution on a tv? Because it's a high definition resolution. 720p is a tv standard and nothing else. It doesn't qualify as the start of high definition. This is where everyone gets confused. They say 600p isn't hi-def but they don't know what it is.
I'm done with this debate and like others you have done nothing to prove me wrong.
600p is more than an improvement over ED which is 480p, not 576p. I'm talking NTSC resolutions. My reasoning and logic is not poor. Why can't you view a 600p resolution on an SD tv? Because it's a high definition resolution. 720p is a tv standard and it's why everyone is confused. It doesn't qualify as the start of high definition it's just one of the standard resolutions that were picked for hidef tv's. People like you say 600p isn't hi-def but you can't tell me or anyone else what it is.
I'm done with this debate and like others you have done nothing to prove me wrong.
it's not about proving you wrong, it's about proving you mule headed. why the fuck do you have a problem with people calling it subHD, afterall won't it be fair for someone to consider 240p to be subSD, the prefix "sub" is just to simply state that it's below the standard. it is a stupid argument indeed, you're trying way too hard to be pedantic, but failing due to flawed reasoning.
alright tor, i'll stop giving you a hard time now.
it's not about proving you wrong, it's about proving you mule headed. why the fuck do you have a problem with people calling it subHD, afterall won't it be fair for someone to consider 240p to be subSD, the prefix "sub" is just to simply state that it's below the standard. it is a stupid argument indeed, you're trying way too hard to be pedantic, but failing due to flawed reasoning.
alright tor, i'll stop giving you a hard time now. :p
it's not about proving you wrong, it's about proving you mule headed. why the fuck do you have a problem with people calling it subHD, afterall won't it be fair for someone to consider 240p to be subSD, the prefix "sub" is just to simply state that it's below the standard. it is a stupid argument indeed, you're trying way too hard to be pedantic, but failing due to flawed reasoning.
alright tor, i'll stop giving you a hard time now.
BTW: how is the bubble number next to our names determined?
if a game can look and run like cod4 and be at 600p and then upscaled wow ,cod4 imo is still one of the nicest looking games out there those levels when your the u.s marine are very realistic.it puts alot of newer games to shame.so for me as long as the games looks and run smooth im not to worried with resolution,i really think people spend to much time on the net reading fucked articles on resolution,my consoles better that yours,this games looks better than that game bullshit,instead of spending hours reading rubbish articles and comments turn on your console and play.speaking of which
It was a nice show….thanks for leaving your shirt on during your whats on my screen recording…and I hope you liked the reviews I sent you tor…..oh and whats this about EA event?!?!? Get at me sir
still working on that. I'm supposed to get an invite. I'll get you in too. Get you doin some work!
If I didn't like the reviews you sent you wouldn't be a Bitbagger fool!
Look i have to agree with Torrence. At first i was with the idea of just letting the term sub HD pass as just a term nothing serious. But think about it, just for a second. Coining sub HD is like saying something is Sub boiling point temperature. Sub HD would infer resolutions below HD, if 600p is HD then it cannot be sub HD.
Great interview Tor about PS 0 damn i would love to see sega bring that franchise back to the consoles and even PC as an MMO….
I'll believe you when you make Weapon X explain his Forza 3 comments from two warzones ago. Saying Forza's Corvettes aren't real, GT's are real, I don't know where they get their models from, that's why Forza can have car damage.
"Bitbag Rocks!"
Lmfao at the Phantasy Star Interview.:$
Love the Show lol but what is that song that your playing for your intro
"Let the Funk Flow" by EPMD off the Strictly Business album.
Thank you so much i could not find who rap that song at all but that shit goes hard tho
lol @ the little HHG pic that popped up when you started talking about him.
and i got Muramasa today! plus some component cables for my Wii to make it look even more beautiful.
LOL, great show once again!
For some reason, I cannot open or play Davis Weekly 8 on my PS3 Browser, it keeps telling me “there is not enough space” and i got 103GB left. I tried to open other Davis Weekly’s and they worked fine except this one, is it because of this s “IntenseDebate comments” under the video, Tor?
cant wait for expo
Lmfao at the Phantasy Star Interview. xD
tor you really could talk some shit at times. first of all, your argument is weak, just because there isn't a formal term for a resolution(x) of 525<x<720 doesn't mean that the term sub-HD is invalid, sub means under, therefore it is a fitting term since 600p is certainly below that which is considered HD(720P). i totally agree with hiphop in saying that games rendered in 600p, 620p or 640p are not HD, they're upscaled to 720p and 1080p, like COD4, halo3, and many many more.
you could be really stubborn sometimes… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nh33bGAxl58
anyways, on a more pleasant note. good job with the davis weeklies, although i do find that they're getting shorter and shorter in duration.
if Sub-HD is below HD and you need an HDTV to view 600p content, then how is 600p not HD? 600p is NOT ED, only 480p is ED. Wouldn't 480p be sub-HD by your definition? Come on JMD you are smarter than that. Forget about the upscale. They are only upscaled to fit the tv screen because HDTV's, unlike computer monitors, can only display in 3 resolutions. So again, how is 600p not HD? Plug a computer into your tv and change the resolution to 800×600 and tell me if you can see it. Then plug it into an HDTV and tell me if you can see it. Then answer the question, how is 600p not HD? One more thing to chew on. If 600p is sub-HD because you claim it's "under" HD, then what is it compared to ED resolution, super-ED?
hey tor, i don't think you understood my post, you said: "Wouldn't 480p be sub-HD by your definition?" which is wrong, because i said "just because there isn't a formal term for a resolution(x) of 576<x<720 doesn't mean that the term sub-HD is invalid" i.e. i defined subHD to be less than 720 and more than 576. (i know i put 525 before, sue me.:) 576 is for us over here in the UK(pal), and 480p is for you yanks(NTSC)
and now you propose that "if Sub-HD is below HD and you need an HDTV to view 600p content, then how is 600p not HD?", very poor reasoning/logic. this paltry argument is stupid, subHD is an appropriate term for 600p and you have said nothing to prove otherwise.
also, i'm fully aware that if i connected my pc to my old trinitron SDTV, it wouldn't display 800×600, i wasn't disputing that.
when it comes to EDTV resolutions, 600p is just an ever so slight improvement over 576p.
600p is more than an improvement over ED which is 480p, not 576p. I'm talking NTSC resolutions. My reasoning and logic is not poor. Why can't you view a 600p resolution on a tv? Because it's a high definition resolution. 720p is a tv standard and nothing else. It doesn't qualify as the start of high definition. This is where everyone gets confused. They say 600p isn't hi-def but they don't know what it is.
I'm done with this debate and like others you have done nothing to prove me wrong.
600p is more than an improvement over ED which is 480p, not 576p. I'm talking NTSC resolutions. My reasoning and logic is not poor. Why can't you view a 600p resolution on an SD tv? Because it's a high definition resolution. 720p is a tv standard and it's why everyone is confused. It doesn't qualify as the start of high definition it's just one of the standard resolutions that were picked for hidef tv's. People like you say 600p isn't hi-def but you can't tell me or anyone else what it is.
I'm done with this debate and like others you have done nothing to prove me wrong.
it's not about proving you wrong, it's about proving you mule headed. why the fuck do you have a problem with people calling it subHD, afterall won't it be fair for someone to consider 240p to be subSD, the prefix "sub" is just to simply state that it's below the standard. it is a stupid argument indeed, you're trying way too hard to be pedantic, but failing due to flawed reasoning.
alright tor, i'll stop giving you a hard time now.
it's not about proving you wrong, it's about proving you mule headed. why the fuck do you have a problem with people calling it subHD, afterall won't it be fair for someone to consider 240p to be subSD, the prefix "sub" is just to simply state that it's below the standard. it is a stupid argument indeed, you're trying way too hard to be pedantic, but failing due to flawed reasoning.
alright tor, i'll stop giving you a hard time now. :p
it's not about proving you wrong, it's about proving you mule headed. why the fuck do you have a problem with people calling it subHD, afterall won't it be fair for someone to consider 240p to be subSD, the prefix "sub" is just to simply state that it's below the standard. it is a stupid argument indeed, you're trying way too hard to be pedantic, but failing due to flawed reasoning.
alright tor, i'll stop giving you a hard time now.
BTW: how is the bubble number next to our names determined?
jmd lmfao that's exactly how Torrence is. xD
Great show Once again!
can we just call it the Twilight Zone of resolutions? lol
Because I dont really know what to call it lol… but you did make a good point that you need a hdtv to see it past 480p so i duno… lol….
who cares f it… if they can amp up the AA and make the game cleaner looking im all for it lol screw it lol
if a game can look and run like cod4 and be at 600p and then upscaled wow ,cod4 imo is still one of the nicest looking games out there those levels when your the u.s marine are very realistic.it puts alot of newer games to shame.so for me as long as the games looks and run smooth im not to worried with resolution,i really think people spend to much time on the net reading fucked articles on resolution,my consoles better that yours,this games looks better than that game bullshit,instead of spending hours reading rubbish articles and comments turn on your console and play.speaking of which
It was a nice show….thanks for leaving your shirt on during your whats on my screen recording…and I hope you liked the reviews I sent you tor…..oh and whats this about EA event?!?!? Get at me sir
still working on that. I'm supposed to get an invite. I'll get you in too. Get you doin some work!
If I didn't like the reviews you sent you wouldn't be a Bitbagger fool!
Yeah…thats true and all but you said what you have gotten hasnt impressed…that hurt man….you burnt me real deep shrek!
LOL @ JMD that arguing with a mule is more like arguing with hiphopgamer.
Look i have to agree with Torrence. At first i was with the idea of just letting the term sub HD pass as just a term nothing serious. But think about it, just for a second. Coining sub HD is like saying something is Sub boiling point temperature. Sub HD would infer resolutions below HD, if 600p is HD then it cannot be sub HD.
Great interview Tor about PS 0 damn i would love to see sega bring that franchise back to the consoles and even PC as an MMO….
you need to sort out your exposure, it keeps shifting
@Torrence,
I'll believe you when you make Weapon X explain his Forza 3 comments from two warzones ago. Saying Forza's Corvettes aren't real, GT's are real, I don't know where they get their models from, that's why Forza can have car damage.