<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Cammy ASSets&#8230;Literally</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebitbag.com/2009/01/06/new-cammy-assetsliterally/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebitbag.com/2009/01/06/new-cammy-assetsliterally/</link>
	<description>The editors from The Bitbag soundoff on technology, video games, anime and whatever else comes to mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:21:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Sitzman</title>
		<link>http://www.thebitbag.com/2009/01/06/new-cammy-assetsliterally/comment-page-1/#comment-3907</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Sitzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebitbag.com/?p=3186#comment-3907</guid>
		<description>Cammy looks many times more buff than in prior editions, including the recently released SSF2THDR.

Honestly having seen this game in motion (videos only, not in person), I have to say I like a lot of the basics and mechanics, but the graphics and animation really aren&#039;t doing it for me.  It&#039;s clear that the dev team was trying hard to bring the feel of classic SF to 3D graphics, but this has been tried before with SFEX, and really that&#039;s what watching SF4 makes me think of - a new super-souped-up SFEX on current-gen consoles.  Now SFEX was surely fun, but it wasn&#039;t classic SF.  Can SF4 still be good?  Maybe.  Even probably.

But I wish to holy fuck they&#039;d get the hell rid of Dan.  Jesus, how crass can you get?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cammy looks many times more buff than in prior editions, including the recently released SSF2THDR.</p>
<p>Honestly having seen this game in motion (videos only, not in person), I have to say I like a lot of the basics and mechanics, but the graphics and animation really aren&#8217;t doing it for me.  It&#8217;s clear that the dev team was trying hard to bring the feel of classic SF to 3D graphics, but this has been tried before with SFEX, and really that&#8217;s what watching SF4 makes me think of &#8211; a new super-souped-up SFEX on current-gen consoles.  Now SFEX was surely fun, but it wasn&#8217;t classic SF.  Can SF4 still be good?  Maybe.  Even probably.</p>
<p>But I wish to holy fuck they&#8217;d get the hell rid of Dan.  Jesus, how crass can you get?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parapraxis</title>
		<link>http://www.thebitbag.com/2009/01/06/new-cammy-assetsliterally/comment-page-1/#comment-3892</link>
		<dc:creator>Parapraxis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebitbag.com/?p=3186#comment-3892</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve said it before, i&#039;ll say it again.

DAT ASS!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve said it before, i&#8217;ll say it again.</p>
<p>DAT ASS!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: METtAL-GAMER</title>
		<link>http://www.thebitbag.com/2009/01/06/new-cammy-assetsliterally/comment-page-1/#comment-3888</link>
		<dc:creator>METtAL-GAMER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebitbag.com/?p=3186#comment-3888</guid>
		<description>So that&#039;s how they are able to sell the game.Capcom needs a new gimmick.Dont you all go drooling over pixels now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So that&#8217;s how they are able to sell the game.Capcom needs a new gimmick.Dont you all go drooling over pixels now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drakol</title>
		<link>http://www.thebitbag.com/2009/01/06/new-cammy-assetsliterally/comment-page-1/#comment-3877</link>
		<dc:creator>Drakol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebitbag.com/?p=3186#comment-3877</guid>
		<description>Mmmm.. Cammy, you dirty gal, you ;D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmmm.. Cammy, you dirty gal, you ;D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
