<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft trying yet again to drop the BC ball</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebitbag.com/2007/03/09/microsoft-trying-yet-again-to-drop-the-bc-ball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebitbag.com/2007/03/09/microsoft-trying-yet-again-to-drop-the-bc-ball/</link>
	<description>The editors from The Bitbag soundoff on technology, video games, anime and whatever else comes to mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:02:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: (edited by moderator)</title>
		<link>http://www.thebitbag.com/2007/03/09/microsoft-trying-yet-again-to-drop-the-bc-ball/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>(edited by moderator)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebitbag.com/?p=77#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Dear God, you&#039;re kidding me.  Our first 6-comment post and we&#039;re hit by a robospammer.  Should I be flattered?  Edited, obviously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear God, you&#8217;re kidding me.  Our first 6-comment post and we&#8217;re hit by a robospammer.  Should I be flattered?  Edited, obviously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanielBright</title>
		<link>http://www.thebitbag.com/2007/03/09/microsoft-trying-yet-again-to-drop-the-bc-ball/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>DanielBright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 16:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebitbag.com/?p=77#comment-23</guid>
		<description>lol, sorry man. Maybe we need to advertise this place more? I&#039;m thinking of including the link in our sigs at the Haven and other sites. Perhaps even creating sig images for sites who&#039;ll allow it, or even banners for support from other sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, sorry man. Maybe we need to advertise this place more? I&#8217;m thinking of including the link in our sigs at the Haven and other sites. Perhaps even creating sig images for sites who&#8217;ll allow it, or even banners for support from other sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Sitzman</title>
		<link>http://www.thebitbag.com/2007/03/09/microsoft-trying-yet-again-to-drop-the-bc-ball/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Sitzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 07:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebitbag.com/?p=77#comment-21</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know whether to be pissed that Dan stole my line, or ecstatic that someone is actually commenting on a topic here.  I should post controversial rants more often.  :-p

To offer a little more backup on the 360 back-compatible question, back in June Peter Moore got his hand slapped by about a million 360 owners when he dropped that line about no one being &quot;concerned&quot; over BC any more.  In the quickly-issued public apology, he referenced the statement that every title would be done, and promised Microsoft would get &quot;darned close&quot; to that goal.  The article is here:

http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/712/712123p1.html

Read through the supporting links and you&#039;ll see reference to the original boast made to GamesIndustry, which was in very clear &quot;100% - you won&#039;t have to keep the older console&quot; language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know whether to be pissed that Dan stole my line, or ecstatic that someone is actually commenting on a topic here.  I should post controversial rants more often.  :-p</p>
<p>To offer a little more backup on the 360 back-compatible question, back in June Peter Moore got his hand slapped by about a million 360 owners when he dropped that line about no one being &#8220;concerned&#8221; over BC any more.  In the quickly-issued public apology, he referenced the statement that every title would be done, and promised Microsoft would get &#8220;darned close&#8221; to that goal.  The article is here:</p>
<p><a href="http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/712/712123p1.html" rel="nofollow">http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/712/712123p1.html</a></p>
<p>Read through the supporting links and you&#8217;ll see reference to the original boast made to GamesIndustry, which was in very clear &#8220;100% &#8211; you won&#8217;t have to keep the older console&#8221; language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo the Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.thebitbag.com/2007/03/09/microsoft-trying-yet-again-to-drop-the-bc-ball/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo the Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 01:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebitbag.com/?p=77#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Thanks.

Now that just a few throw-away multiplatform sports titles are the only new Xbox games coming out, MS just has to play clean-up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Now that just a few throw-away multiplatform sports titles are the only new Xbox games coming out, MS just has to play clean-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanielBright</title>
		<link>http://www.thebitbag.com/2007/03/09/microsoft-trying-yet-again-to-drop-the-bc-ball/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>DanielBright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebitbag.com/?p=77#comment-19</guid>
		<description>http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/05/20/news_6126204.html

&quot;Our goal is to have every Xbox game work on Xbox 360.&quot;

This was said to address previous rumors that the 360 wouldn&#039;t be BC. While they did not &#039;promise&#039;, it was pretty much implied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/05/20/news_6126204.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/05/20/news_6126204.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Our goal is to have every Xbox game work on Xbox 360.&#8221;</p>
<p>This was said to address previous rumors that the 360 wouldn&#8217;t be BC. While they did not &#8216;promise&#8217;, it was pretty much implied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo the Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.thebitbag.com/2007/03/09/microsoft-trying-yet-again-to-drop-the-bc-ball/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo the Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 23:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebitbag.com/?p=77#comment-18</guid>
		<description>When did they ever promise 100%?  The wording at the E3 05 conference was to make the &quot;top selling Xbox titles&quot; backwards compatable.  If there&#039;s any instance where they specifiaclly said &quot;100%,&quot; please mention it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When did they ever promise 100%?  The wording at the E3 05 conference was to make the &#8220;top selling Xbox titles&#8221; backwards compatable.  If there&#8217;s any instance where they specifiaclly said &#8220;100%,&#8221; please mention it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
